What I think of lgbt
11.04.2020
12 comments
RamblingAndUnpopular[OP]
11.04.2020 17:50
LinkHonestly, I have nothing against them... but some sexualities are just utter jokes to me.
The ones I don’t see as jokes:
(Hetero- I don’t think I have to say why)
Homo (this includes both gays and lesbians) and personally, it’s because some people are attracted to the same sex-
Bi- you can be attracted to just male and female and nothing else
Pan- people can just be attracted to anyone
Ace- people can be attracted to no one
Trans- gender dysphoria. You can’t control gender dysphoria.
Non-binary- I would presume this is also gender dysphoria, but because I don’t know much, I’m not going to assume it’s fake.
I see most others as a joke-
“Bi-curios” what the- I-
Listen, I’m hetero, but just because I’m curious what it would be like to screw a dude, it doesn’t mean It’s a whole new sexuality.
If that where the case, what would you call it if was curious of what screwing an orange would be like? aurantium-curious?
RamblingAndUnpopular[OP]
11.04.2020 17:51
LinkWhy did I say personally for homo- that isn’t even personal- what-
honestly tho yeah....... but i think bi-curious is like. smth to id with while ur figuring ur shit out..... cuz you might end up bein straight or gay or bi n stuff n bi-curious is the "yeah i have no idea what the **** i am"
though ur definition of bi is a bit off cuz im bi and im attracted to everyone. n personally i think pan is bi-trans-homo-phobic but i wont get into that. but ya if i see the term sapiosexual again i think ill lose my marbles
Pansexual is accepting of all people nomatter who they are, so please do explain your reasonings, because it sounds more like you’re Pansexual.
Pan: all
Pan-sexual: attracted to all genders.
Also. Bi: means two
Bi-sexual: attracted to two genders.
So no, my defeninition isn’t off, my defenition is the textbook one.
Also- just looked up what that is, and. I’m laughing
ok so like. the original meaning of bisexual was "attraction to all genders" and has been for l;ike over 33 years iirc? and the argument "bi means two" is bullshit because pan means all and that implies you'd have sex with anything.. also the originl meaning for pan was something like. loving everything like dogs n shit. n the "oh but we're tattracted to personalityt not gender!!" is homophobic n bi phobic and. everything phobic cuz nobody is attracted toi the concept of gender. i dont look at a man n go I WOULD BANG THAT. neither would a gay man or a lesbian. everyone is attracted to personality. unless ur aro but like. im not talking abt aro or ace so. and the 'oh but we're attracted to trans n nb people too" is transphobic becauyse trans isnt a gender and anyone can be attracted to nb people regardless of sexuality. pan was only made because of all of the horrible stereotypes aurrounding bi.
I think I understand where your coming from.
But no.
Bicycle does not mean “all wheels” As bi means two, and cycle means wheels.
Bi is Latin. It means “two”
So whoever thought “Bi-sexual” meant attracted to all was clearly wrong grammatically. You’re thinking of Omni-sexual. Which would be the attraction to multiple things. An Omni-tool has more than one use. Or atleast that’s what it would be if it was still using Latin, as Omni is Latin.
Pan is Greek. It’s the Greek counterpart to Omni. Both mean “all” or “Multiple” pan is just a lot looser than Omni.
Therefore, Pansexuality is the attraction to multiple things.
Also, how it’s trans/homophobic makes 0 sense.
That would be like me saying that homosexuality is heterophobic by nature, as it’s not attracted to the opposite sex.
Pansexuality usually relies on personality, as they have no preference. Meaning personality would be what they would have to go off of.
Please, do some research on Greek and Latin prefixes, suffixes, and roots.
Comment removed
the prefix doesnt matter here. experiences from bi men, women, and nb people does. and EVERYONE is attracted to personality. bisexuality is fluid and preference can shift from mostly same sex attracted to opposite sex attrected to just. I Like Everyone. and we didnt coin the term "bisexual," it was like.. considered a medical condition in the 80's, along with homosexuality. people thought it could be cured. anyway the definition back then was "attraction to everyone" and then we reclaimed it n we're where we are now. and i think it makes perfect sense why the "oh but im attracted to trans ppl too!!" thing is transphobic? im not some "third gender." im a guy, respect that. nb people arent some third gender either, they're both or nothing. straight people are sttracted to trans people, so are gay people. and pansexuality was still made cuz of the horrible stereotypes surrounding bi at the time. people thought we were sluts and cheaters and we were lying abt being bi. but suddenly when someone's pan they dont f-
-ace the same stereotypes. also i'd like to point out that the lesbian flag is replaced with the pan or ace flag way more often than i'm comfortable with, and im not even a lesbian. pansexual, polysexual (not polyamourous!!*) and omnisexual are bullshit because bi could be any of those. terms like "homoflexible" are equally biphobic. if you identity with stuff like that, the most likely thing is that youve got internallized biphobia and are just avoiding id'ing with it. hell, i still have internallized biphobia all cuz of this m-spec shit. it took forever to figure out that No, I Was Just Bi and not a "panromantic graysexual homosexual."
Do. Research.
Please.
For the love of the gods do some research on Greek and Latin roots. My reason to debunk your arguments would be the exact same as I’ve already stated. Where’s the factual evidence that bi doesn’t mean “two” .
Just because you restated what you said before and changed the words a little, doesn’t make it right. As I could debunk it with the exact same argument I just used.
Also. Saying that you accept trans makes you quite to opposite of transphobic.
I, personally, as a straight male, would never knowingly date a transgender. why? Because biologically, they would not be female, and biologically, I would not be able to reproduce with them. Your argument there makes little to no sense, as yes, they could be considered another gender, as there’s a reason the terms “Cis” and “Trans” exist.
Otherwise, If they wheren’t diffrent, I would not consider transgenders as part of the lgbt community.
I didn’t think you hated Pansexuals, as that would be stupid, as from what you’ve
Told me, you fit into the current definition of a Pansexual.
Also, as a side note, Because (insert prefix here)romantic is a joke to me. I can understand what you’d be trying to say with it, but it makes no sense. An asexual panromantic is an oxymoron to an extent.