You replied

if you want somewhat of an explanation, i could direct you to one, if that makes things a bit more understandable

i suppose thats an easy route to go, yes please explain

mostly everything is here.

R i don't have the motivation to really fight/defend anyone (sorry) right now so uh. Yeah, noone really is right nor wrong i guess. Sure yeah stew might've said something that offended you in some way, and people sometimes need to refrain from saying/doing said things, such as this situation is an example. But, both sides/both opinions need to be heard no matter what, even if you're in the right and they're gonna be in the wrong who knows? Maybe they might prove a point that you didn't mention, or just straight up prove you wrong, or maybe it's the other way round but still

i wasn't involved in this situation.

most likely not, i have no idea what went on

well, i kinda do??just not fully

everything is between trashy and sus.

trashy was saying that among us ocs are original, stu didn't agree. so stu had replied while also voicing their opinion. thus sparking an argument.

Oh okay nevermind, i suppose both sides voiced opinions now ty for confirmation. And to be honest, i'm gonna have to agree with stew on this one, now i don't wanna say why i agree as to why i also think among us ocs aren't entirely original as someone who isn't apart of this may get offended and just start shit-talking me. But I can see why he believes so, it's mainly due to the fact on how we think just adding horns, tentacles, or clouds or rings to an already existing character/design (which in this case is the most likely not original yet it still belongs to the creators of that design) of well, among us ocs! What i mean is that if yo take the basic roundish-like character, but just add accessories and call it your "oc" then it doesn't seem very original sadly.

*of well, the crewmate design!